Brick
This movie looks damn interesting.
Add comment January 29th, 2006
Archive for January, 2006
Azumi
Azumi is not a film that takes itself too seriously. It’s fluff - great for that sleepy sunday afternoon after a heavy night out. Basically a filmed anime, it does a one thing so right that it needs to be called out. The camera stays still while the fight moves around.
The recent trend in Hollywood has been to put the audience closer to the fight. Put them in the middle of the fight. (Looking at you Paul Greengrass). This does not help. In the middle of the fight is confusing. Bewilderment is probably not the emotion you want to elicit in the middle of a fight sequence.
Azumi has some great fight scenes, and they’re filmed clearly and with an eye towards an overview of the geography of the fight. The final battle starts with a wonderful crane shot over the hundreds of warriors running towards the lone heroine.
The camera does get to play a starring role at the end of the fight: Azumi and the evil villain fight on a plank suspended high above the ground, and the camera goes into spinning gyrations around the two as they spar. The vertigo inducing camerawork is excusable on the grounds that the seasick-inducing effect is probably what was wanted.
Add comment January 29th, 2006
Battlestar Galactica 2.5
The most excellent show (Time magazine says so) is back on air, and thanks to the magic of the internet, I don’t have to wait a year for the DVD to show up here in Norway. Even more impressive is the producer (Ron Moore) who puts up commentary on the episode on the web every frackin’ week. What’s fascinating is the way he describes the evolution of an episode. The show may claim that there is an overall plan, but the tales of day-to-day writing, rewriting, restructuring and retrying makes it all seem like a struggle to make it as good as possible. The mentions of discarded storylines and salvaged bits and pieces from ideas that never went anywhere makes me look at all stories with a new eye.
Anyway: Spaceships, robots, drama. Bliss.
Add comment January 7th, 2006
WikiCalc and REST architecture
Dan Bricklin the co-inventor of the spreadsheet has started to build a web-based spreadsheet - WikiCalc
As office software moves onto the web, it can become more open and collaborative. Consider a web-based spreadsheet, where every cell is addressable through a URL.
If the spreadsheet is at
http://www.example.com/calc/myStuff
then the first cell of the spreadsheet should be adressable as
http://www.example.com/calc/myStuff/R1C1
Ok - now consider a spreadsheet somewhere else - the second spreadsheet could reference the results of a calculation in my sheet by reference to the URL of the cell in the spreadsheet. The second spreadsheet could contain a formula like this:
= 2 * http://www.example.com/calc/myStuff/R1C1
This is just a straightforward application of the REST architecture.
This could be a great way for government to expose standard values. Income tax rates, VAT rates and so on - easily referenced and automatically updated.
http//www.example.gov/taxrates/2006/vat/goods returns the VAT on goods in 2006 (25% in Norway).
http//www.example.gov/taxrates/current/vat/goods returns the VAT on goods at the moment.
When the rate is changed next year, the current value is updated - and all applications that reference it get the new, fresh value without a software-update.
Now imagine what happens if we extend this to all XML documents through XPath - i.e pretend that the web server is smart enough to dig into an XML document and pull out a fragment, rather than just sending back the entire document. i.e. URLs that reference bits of a document using XPath, not just entire documents:
http://www.xfront.com/REST-Web-Services.html - this gives us the entire document.
http://www.xfront.com/REST-Web-Services.html/html/body/H2[0] - would in an ideal world give us the contents of the first second level heading: “What is REST?”
Imagine how easily you could glue together web-applications with this kind addressing…
The text fragment extraction wouldn’t have to be done by the web-server, it could just as well be done by the application. The point is that the URL would make integration with existing, well-formed content much much easier. And while much content out there isn’t well-formed (and so can’t be addressed in this way), the next generation of Office tools will output suitable content by default.
When everything is addressable, then everything becomes intertwingled. A point of potential intergration. Lots of places for leverage.
Of course, all the hard problems of versioning and formatting don’t go away, but they apply to all kinds of solutions, not just this one.
1 comment January 7th, 2006
MTV Norway
is obviously a little different from boring old MTV… They just ran Tenacious D’s explicit and animated love-song video. Not bleep or a standards-and-practices lawyer in sight.
Smut! It’s not just for the internet any more!
Add comment January 4th, 2006